17 October 2008
PSigma's Bill Mott, veteran UK equity fund manager, has said in a recent conference call to clients and advisers that this may be the 'beginning of the end' of the market conditions that we have had over the last few months. The action we have seen from the British government, the Bank of England and the Treasury with regard to the banks in the UK will be seen as the blueprint that other world nations should use. For the first time in some years, the UK could be seen to be leading the rest of the world in innovative financial policy-setting. Mott said that as a result, UK equities are offering excellent medium-term value on any sort of reasonable timescale. Mott said, "The first step that the government has taken in underwriting the banks' balance sheets will be very positive for the economy in general and I would expect it to be followed by significant cuts in interest rates over the next few months. Clearly the Bank of England's worry about inflation over the last 6 months has now proved to be misplaced. Deflation is much more of a fear both in the UK and elsewhere in the world and I can therefore see no reason for UK interest rates not to fall dramatically." The question then becomes will the underwriting of the capital of the banks, plus a collapse in interest rates, be enough to revive the UK economy? Or are we so downtrodden by our 'credit bubble' and debt deflation that falling interest rates will not have any effect? Mott commented that he thought that question remains to be answered. "My best guess is that these actions will alleviate the downward spiral in the economy but the recovery will be somewhat anemic."
"In my view, equities are undoubtedly cheap on a long-term basis. Whether this is the absolute nadir and how quickly we recover is more debatable. Led by the British government, central and banks and governments worldwide are now fully aware of the extent of the problem and therefore all the 'heavy artillery' will be rolled out to try to avoid a Japan-style meltdown," he said.
On commenting on equities, Mott said, "It is sensible to have asset allocation in a variety of asset classes, but people should not think that equities are a high-risk asset class. It is very appropriate at the moment to have a proportion of your wealth in equities and I would suggest that a broadly spread UK equity portfolio with no big stock-specific risks is a sensible policy for part of one's wealth at the moment. There is a good chance that what we have seen over the last couple of days is an inflection point for markets. Of the difficulties has been to try and co-ordinate international action to do the same things that the UK has done.
"We are trading very actively, given the day-to-day volatility in the market. There are 103 stocks in the portfolio and until a week ago there was only one company in the fund (Premier Farnell) which had a 'more than 1% against the index' relative weighting," said Mott of the portfolio. "I can make a case for the defensive areas. I do not think they are as attractive as some of the more economically-sensitive areas but if we see falling interest rates, then the returns on some of these areas are attractive compared to returns on cash. Equally, domestic cyclicals (pub-operators, house-builders, retailers) should benefit from greater mobility of money around the system, following the government's intervention and from falling interest rates and of course this area of the market is very cheaply rated. Equally I can make a case for some of the international cyclicals which had been riding high until seven or eight weeks ago and of course have fallen in a complete heap in the last weeks."
"In the last 2-3 weeks, we have bought our first holdings in the miners, having had zero weighting. Over the last 3-4 weeks in particular, we have been taking relatively low stock-specific risks throughout the fund. 72% of the portfolio is in the FTSE 100, whilst the rest is in mid-cap stocks. We reduced our overweight positions we had in domestic cyclicals and that has been put into other areas of the market, some into defensives and some into internationally-exposed stocks. The bias of the fund is, however, still a bit towards domestic cyclicals, relative to the peer group."
"We increased our weightings in utilities and defensives. We have 2% in International Power and Scottish & Southern. We have less than 5% in Centrica, National Grid and the water companies. We are market-weighted in the pharmaceuticals and oil companies but are overweight in tobacco and telecoms such as BT, Cable & Wireless and Vodafone. We are also overweight in the retailers (such as WH Smith), pub-operators, defence, construction (such as Balfour and Carillion), foods (such as Dairy Crest and Tate & Lyle) and support services (Premier Farnell and Travis Perkins). I am comfortable with the shape of the portfolio and I want to have the appropriate level of conviction when I have a strong view, but also the right risk spread. The portfolio is not as defensive as some in our peer group and I think that the biggest risk is in the stock price and not in the market."
Mott thinks banks are cheap, although he says the market needs time to know that the worst is over. "After this trauma is over, the banks will be in a powerful position because there will be fewer strong competitors. Looking at the HBoS/Lloyds merger, the new company is going to have a third of the mortgage market in the UK with very wide margins and in normal times that would not be achievable, due to competition rules The banks will become like 'private sector utilities' and will be allowed wide margins on the business they do. They will be regulated strictly and they will be much lower risk investments with good returns. The problem is just getting from where we are now to that point."
"Prior to last weekend's announcement of the government stakes in the major banks, we were fractionally overweight in the four domestic banks but close to the index weighting. Obviously the dividends have mostly vanished for the foreseeable future. We will make an assessment about what we will do with the banks, given that lack of dividend."
PSigma